Website System / Predictive Support

Bee Cue

Helping beekeepers turn fragmented ecological signals into timely decisions.

Bee Cue combines weather, flowering, and colony activity data into a predictive decision-support system, helping beekeepers understand emerging mismatch risks and compare possible responses.

Bee Cue website interface showing a map-based ecological prediction system
Project Overview

Bee Cue is a graduation design project that translates ecological prediction into a readable, interactive and working web system for beekeeping practice.

Project Type

Graduation Design / Interactive Website / Data Visualization System

My Contribution

I led the end-to-end design and development of Bee Cue’s digital system, from system architecture and prediction logic to interaction design, data visualization and front-end implementation.

Team Collaboration

Collaborators contributed the ecological corridor design and hive sensing component.

Duration

2025 - 2026

Deliverables

Working Website / Data Dashboard / Prediction Logic / Project Film / Research Report

Tools & Methods

Python, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Weather API, Sensor Data, Rule-based Models, Machine Learning Correction

Context

China Academy of Art, Art & Technology Graduation Project

Final Product

Working Web System

The final outcome is a functional web system connecting a site-based map, ecological indexes, bee activity data, scenario comparison and AI-assisted follow-up.

Bee Cue live website displayed on a laptopOpen Live Website ↗

01 Website Overview

Bee Cue brings together weather, flowering, and bee activity data in one platform. This demo introduces the homepage, the system’s main functions, and how different data sources are organized across the website.

02 Environmental & Bee Activity Exploration

Shows how users explore the site through map zooming, environmental indicator curves, bee-activity heatmaps, and location-based activity indices to understand changing conditions across the field.

environment
bee activity

03 Strategy & AI Support

Demonstrates how users compare recommended strategies, open a plan for detailed guidance, and continue exploring the selected strategy through the AI assistant.

strategy
ai support
Design Challenge

Ecological timing is becoming harder to read.

Climate change destabilizes the timing between flowering and bee activity, making nectar windows and mismatch risk harder to judge through experience alone.

01
Illustration showing climate change affecting flowering and bee activity timing
Climate Patterns Are Shifting

Seasonal temperature and rainfall patterns are becoming less stable.

02
Illustration showing irregular nectar flow patterns in beekeeping practice
Flowering Windows Are Moving

Bloom timing can occur earlier, later, or for shorter periods.

03
Illustration showing beekeepers making decisions on site
Bee Activity Does Not Always Shift at the Same Pace

Changes in colony activity may not remain synchronized with flowering conditions.

04
Illustration showing fragmented ecological and beekeeping information
Mismatch Risk Is Hard to Detect Early

The divergence between flowering and bee activity can be difficult to recognize before it affects field decisions.

Research

Grounded in ecological and field context

Literature, field observation and data mapping established the ecological and operational context for the system.

01

Literature Review

The research began with phenological mismatch, pollination, climate change and agricultural decision support systems.

Literature Review research collage
02

Field Context

Field observation focused on the beekeeping site, nectar plant distribution, seasonal changes and local environmental conditions.

Field Context research collage
03

Data Sources

The system was built around three main types of information: weather data, flowering data and bee activity data.

Data Sources research collage
From Research to Product

What beekeepers need — and how Bee Cue responds

Field research showed that the challenge is not a lack of data, but turning scattered ecological signals into information that supports timely judgment.

01 — See related signals together

Weather, flowering and bee activity are often interpreted separately.

See related signals together
Product response

Unified ecological view — bring all three signals into one interface.

02 — Understand what is changing

Raw data alone is difficult to translate into action.

Understand what is changing
Product response

Readable mismatch signals — highlight changing trends and emerging divergence.

03 — Keep human judgment in control

Beekeeping decisions depend on local experience and context.

Keep human judgment in control
Product response

Multiple strategies, not one prescribed answer — support comparison before action.

04 — Move quickly from insight to response

Users need practical next steps once a potential risk appears.

Move quickly from insight to response
Product response

Scannable guidance + AI follow-up — move from signal to action without long technical reading.

Prioritization

What needed to be in the first usable system

Features were prioritized around the most immediate questions beekeepers need to answer: what is changing, why it matters, and what they can do next.

Core / MVP

24h prediction · mismatch status · environmental view · bee activity · strategy comparison

Secondary

strategy details · historical comparison · model correction

Future

multi-apiary management · mobile workflow · alerts · deeper personalization

System Logic

From Data to Decision Support

Bee Cue combines transparent rule-based ecological models with a machine learning correction layer. A daily automated pipeline synchronizes new weather and hive observations, recalculates ecological indexes, retrains the correction model and exports updated results to the website.

Machine Learning Boundary

Machine learning is used as a correction layer, not as a black-box replacement or automatic decision-making engine.

Bee Cue prediction logic flow from ecological data to decision support
System Evolution

Two system-level changes shaped the final product.

01Interaction Evolution
Single Suggestion→Scenario Comparison + Detailed Guidance + AI Follow-up

The system moved away from one fixed answer and now lets users compare possibilities while retaining practical judgment.

02Model Evolution
Rule-based Prediction→Rule-based Models + ML-assisted Correction

Transparent ecological rules remain the foundation, while observed hive activity is used to recalibrate prediction deviation.

Working Web System

A connected map, dashboard, strategy and AI experience.

Automated Data Pipeline

Daily synchronization, index recalculation, model retraining and web export.

Historical Correction

706 samples · MAE 0.1085 → 0.0875 after ML-assisted correction.

Field Evaluation

Voice of Beekeeping Practitioners

Through task-based walkthroughs with members of a beekeeping cooperative, we identified recurring concerns around language, information density, and actionable guidance.

Members of a beekeeping cooperative testing the Bee Cue website on a desktop computer
Task-based prototype evaluation at a beekeeping cooperative.

It’s useful to see the weather, flowers, and bee activity all in one place.

I like that it shows why it’s making a suggestion, not just telling me what to do.

I’d like to compare two or three possible locations before deciding where to move.

Project Film

How Bee Cue Works

A short explainer film illustrating how environmental data, bee activity, ecological models, and prediction logic work together to support beekeeping decisions.

Reflection
What I Learned

This project strengthened my ability to connect ecological research, data structures, prediction logic, interaction design and front-end implementation within one working system.

Next Step

Future development will focus on longer-term field data, cross-season and cross-site validation, improved mobile use and stronger feedback loops with practitioners.